Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Therefore 'aRb' would express three distinct propositions. — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Complex predicates cannot be terms for complex universals, because if they were, a relational sentence of the form 'aRb' would express three distinct propositions rather than one.

    Therefore 'aRb' would express three distinct propositions.

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    But 'aRb' says only one thing: that aRb.Complex predicates cannot be terms for complex universals, because if they were,...If these complex predicates are terms for different universals, then each yields...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If two analyses of a proposition invoke different constituents, then they are an...
    +1 moreShow less
    In a sentence of the form 'aRb', more than one complex predicate can be isolated...

    Similar

    The proposition p expressed by David's utterance is distinct from the ...81%'Believes' expresses a relation between individuals and propositions o...79%'That'-clauses must refer to propositions.78%Therefore, on Adams's approach, it is necessary that there are proposi...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ramsey
    View source passageHide passage
    Ramsey begins his new examination by considering whether molecular statements can be analysed into subjects and predicates – specifically predicates which stand for complex universals. He argues, reductio ad absurdum, that they don’t. He assumes that if two analyses of a proposition invoke different constituents then they are analyses of different propositions. Absurdity results when this assumption is combined with the claim that complex predicates are terms for complex universals. This is beca

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective