Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore, Bentham's own hedonic calculus—accounting for ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Classic utilitarianism implies that a government should not provide free contraceptives even when the population increase causes widespread suffering, because total net utility increases with more people.

    Therefore, Bentham's own hedonic calculus—accounting for intensity, duration, and extent of pleasure and pain—can mandate contraceptive provision when suffering is widespread and severe.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Bentham(The statement references his specific idea about trust and power)
    Jeremy Bentham was an 18th-century British philosopher who believed the goal of society should be to create the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.
    Contraceptive provision(as an ethical action the hedonic calculus might support)
    Making birth control methods available and accessible to people who want to use them.
    Extent(as a dimension of measuring happiness)
    How many people are affected by the pleasure—a choice that makes one person happy counts differently than one that makes many people happy.
    Hedonic calculus(as the secular, non-religious framework Benatar uses)
    A method of evaluating what's good or bad by measuring pleasure and pain—basically, a way of thinking about morality based on adding up happiness versus suffering.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Intensity(one way natural and supernatural cognition might differ)
    The degree or strength of something; here, how powerful or clear the knowledge is.
    Mandate(as what the hedonic calculus can justify doing)
    To officially require or authorize something as the right course of action.
    duration(Bergson's conception, illustrated via the spool-and-tape image)
    Continuity of progress and heterogeneity; the prolongation of the past into the present.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism1 linked

    Related

    Classic utilitarianism implies that a government should not provide free contrac...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective