Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, categorical desires provide reasons to practice detachment, not reasons to live.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Categorical desires are constitutive of meaningful human life—love, creativity, and purpose inherently involve them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Reasons to live require some categorical desires; detachment from all such desires leaves no motivational ground for living.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim conflates 'reasons to practice detachment' with 'reasons not to live'—one can desire detachment while valuing life.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Categorical desires (desires for their own sake) bind us to endless pursuits that generate suffering when unfulfilled.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Detachment from categorical desires reduces psychological attachment to outcomes, which is necessary for equanimity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Living well requires freedom from compulsive desire-satisfaction; detachment enables this freedom more than pursuing desires.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.