Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore condign merit, properly understood as grace-elevated merit, does not require natural commensurability between creature and God.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If grace supplies what merit lacks, calling it 'merit' conflates two distinct concepts and obscures rather than clarifies the theological relationship.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Claiming grace enables incommensurable acts to become meritorious merely relocates the problem—grace itself requires explanation for its differential application.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
True commensurability cannot be bypassed by appeal to divine economy; proportionality is a logical requirement for merit, not merely a human category.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Grace fundamentally transforms the agent's capacity, making finite acts genuinely valuable before infinite goodness without requiring natural equivalence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Merit language requires only proportional reward-relationship within a grace-structured economy, not metaphysical commensurability between orders of being.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Denying grace-elevated merit either makes creaturely acts worthless or implies creatures naturally deserve divine reward—both theologically problematic.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.