Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Therefore disjunctivism mimics the logical form of determ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Disjunctivism accommodates requisite determination

    Therefore disjunctivism mimics the logical form of determination without capturing its essential metaphysical character.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Disjunctivism treats perception as either veridical or hallucinatory, mirroring determination's binary structure without explaining causal dependency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Determination requires one state necessitating another; disjunctivism merely posits alternative states without grounding their necessity relation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The logical form (A or B) can be satisfied without metaphysical grounding in powers, substances, or causal production that determination demands.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Disjunctivism's distinction between success and failure cases captures essential metaphysical difference that determination theory also requires.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Logical form and metaphysical character are not separable: how states relate logically constitutes part of their genuine metaphysical structure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim assumes determination has a univocal 'essential character' beyond logical structure—a substantive metaphysical claim needing independent argument.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Causation1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Determination requires one state necessitating another; disjunctivism merely pos...Disjunctivism accommodates requisite determinationDisjunctivism treats perception as either veridical or hallucinatory, mirroring ...Disjunctivism's distinction between success and failure cases captures essential...
    +3 moreShow less
    Logical form and metaphysical character are not separable: how states relate log...The claim assumes determination has a univocal 'essential character' beyond logi...The logical form (A or B) can be satisfied without metaphysical grounding in pow...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit