Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, divine freedom from necessity is incompatible with the classical doctrine of divine perfection.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Divine perfection entails that God necessarily acts according to His perfect nature; this necessity is internal, not external coercion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Freedom from necessity is itself imperfect—a limitation. Perfect beings require nothing outside themselves; contingency implies deficiency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Genuine randomness or indeterminacy is incompatible with omniscience; perfect knowledge requires God's actions be internally determined.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Perfect goodness requires that God freely choose the good, not be necessitated toward it by external constraint or logical law.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If God's actions flow necessarily from His nature, His choices lack genuine deliberation and merit, undermining moral perfection.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Classical perfection includes maximal agency and autonomy; necessity entails dependence on prior determining conditions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.