Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore, divine simplicity does not strictly entail tim... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Commitment to divine simplicity entails a commitment to divine timelessness.

    Therefore, divine simplicity does not strictly entail timelessness, but only the absence of composition in God's nature.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Composition and temporal succession are distinct metaphysical properties; lack of parts doesn't logically require timelessness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.God could be temporally extended yet internally simple if His temporal states constitute one unified act without internal division.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Classical theology often treats simplicity and omniscience as separate divine attributes, suggesting they don't necessarily entail each other.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If God exists in time, His being at t1 differs from being at t2, creating composition between temporal stages—contradicting strict simplicity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Temporal existence requires potentiality (what God could do next), but divine simplicity entails pure actuality, not potential becoming.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Any temporal God must relate differently to past, present, and future events, introducing real internal distinctions that violate simplicity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Afterlife & Death1 linked

    Related

    Any temporal God must relate differently to past, present, and future events, in...Classical theology often treats simplicity and omniscience as separate divine at...Commitment to divine simplicity entails a commitment to divine timelessness.Composition and temporal succession are distinct metaphysical properties; lack o...
    +3 moreShow less
    God could be temporally extended yet internally simple if His temporal states co...If God exists in time, His being at t1 differs from being at t2, creating compos...Temporal existence requires potentiality (what God could do next), but divine si...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit