Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, event types serving as propositions need not themselves be structured entities even if the proposition's representational role is structured.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If propositions have structured representational roles, their metaphysical bearers must exhibit corresponding structural properties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Event types lack the requisite complexity to ground fine-grained propositional distinctions that structured roles demand.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Positing unstructured entities that possess structured representational functions creates unexplained explanatory gaps.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Representational structure can emerge from functional roles rather than intrinsic composition of the vehicle itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Event tokens can ground propositions while event types remain causally efficacious without being structurally complex.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Structured content doesn't require structured bearers, just as structured information needn't require structured storage media.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.