Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore God's creative act cannot be entirely absolved of responsibility merely by the intervening freedom of creatures.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Genuine libertarian freedom requires that creature choices are not determined by prior causes, including God's creative act or foreknowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Responsibility requires causal proximity; one is responsible for direct actions but not for all distant consequences of others' free choices.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
God cannot be held responsible for respecting the autonomy God grants; creating free agents entails accepting their undetermined choices.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
God's omniscience means God foreknew all creature choices before creation, making God causally accountable for the world that results.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Creating a system where evil occurs (even through free creatures) makes the creator responsible for permitting that system's structure.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Moral responsibility cannot be entirely transferred; the ultimate originator of causal chains retains some accountability for outcomes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.