Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, grace that fulfills divinely-imposed creaturely needs is not purely supererogatory but partly responsive to self-generated obligations.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Creatures cannot generate binding obligations on an omnipotent being; only God's nature and commands establish moral requirements.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The distinction between responsive and supererogatory grace collapses if divine grace is eternally foreknown; all appears responsive retroactively.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Creaturely self-generated obligations presume libertarian free will, which conflicts with divine omniscience and causal determinism.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Creatures generate obligations through their own actions and choices, creating genuine debts that exist independently of divine will.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Divine grace responding to creature-generated needs demonstrates moral consistency: God honors the causal structures He created.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If grace were purely supererogatory, God would bear no moral relationship to harms creatures inflict on themselves through sin.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.