Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore, 'Milton!' in Wordsworth's poem must have some ... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Representing in literature is a speech act

    Therefore, 'Milton!' in Wordsworth's poem must have some speech act potential, meaning its use constitutes a speech act

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Connections

    1 topic

    Aesthetics2 linked

    Related

    If a linguistic expression were used in a representation without performing any ...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    On the Alston/Beardsley theory of meaning, an expression with no speech act pote...
    Representing in literature is a speech act
    The expression 'Milton!' in Wordsworth's poem evidently does have meaning

    Similar

    The speech act potentials of 'Milton!' within a literary poem and outs...91%Literary expressions such as 'Milton!' retain speech act potential87%Representing in literature is a speech act84%The expression 'Milton!' in Wordsworth's poem evidently does have mean...84%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: beardsley-aesthetics
    View source passageHide passage
    And it’s probably a good thing that representing is a speech act. If “Milton!” in Wordsworth’s poem were being used in a representation that wasn’t the performance of any speech act at all, that would presumably be because it had no speech act potential. On the Alston/Beardsley theory of meaning, it would then have no meaning. Since it evidently does have meaning, it has to have some speech act potential. And since it seems to share a good deal of its meaning with “Milton!” as bellowed by a seve

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective