Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore panpsychism introduces a category of fundamental facts that violates the supervenience base physicalism requires, making them incompatible.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Panpsychism can be formulated as physicalism about fundamental particles plus their intrinsic phenomenal properties, preserving supervenience.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The claim that phenomenal properties violate physicalism begs the question by assuming consciousness cannot be a fundamental physical property.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Supervenience requires only that higher-level facts depend on base facts; panpsychism satisfies this without adding non-physical fundamentals.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Physicalism requires all fundamental facts supervene on physical facts; panpsychism posits irreducible phenomenal facts at the base level.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If consciousness is fundamental and non-physical, no amount of physical facts alone can fully determine all facts about reality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Supervenience base physicalism demands no fundamental properties beyond physical ones; panpsychism violates this core requirement.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.