Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, Pereboom's intuition pump about Case 4 misidentifies the relevant condition for moral responsibility.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Case 4's intuition pump works precisely because causal history IS relevant to whether an agent is genuinely their own source of action.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Pereboom correctly identifies that determinism plus identical prior states entail identical behavior, undermining agent ownership of choices.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Dismissing his condition as 'irrelevant' requires independent argument that causal history doesn't matter—merely asserting this begs the question.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Case 4 conflates causal history with agent control, but responsibility requires present deliberative capacity, not origin conditions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Pereboom's pump intuits sameness where the cases differ: only some agents retain reactive attitudes and rational responsiveness to reasons.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If responsibility tracked Pereboom's condition, identical neurological duplicates in different universes would have opposite moral status.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.