Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, practical wisdom is a necessary but insufficient determinant of moral choice, which is also constituted by non-rational desire.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If non-rational desire truly co-constitutes moral choice, we cannot consistently hold people morally responsible for their actions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Practical wisdom by definition includes evaluating and integrating desires rationally, making the distinction between them artificial.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Attributing moral failure to 'non-rational desire' rather than deficient wisdom merely relocates rather than solves the problem.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Humans regularly make moral choices contrary to their reasoned judgment, showing desire operates independently of practical wisdom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Virtuous action requires emotional alignment with reason; pure intellect cannot motivate without appetitive engagement.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Moral development involves cultivating non-rational dispositions like compassion and courage alongside rational deliberation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.