Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore, refuting the ontological argument is not a pre... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The advocate of the argument from evil needs to be able to show that the ontological argument is unsound.

    Therefore, refuting the ontological argument is not a prerequisite burden for the argument from evil but a consequence of its success, not a precondition.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Problem of Evil1 linked

    Related

    The advocate of the argument from evil needs to be able to show that the ontolog...

    Details

    Type

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective