Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, resemblance to God is at most a derivative marker of goodness, not a necessary condition that does genuine explanatory work.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If God necessarily exemplifies all perfections, then resembling God is constitutive of goodness, not merely derivative to it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Moral convergence across worldviews could reflect convergent discovery of objective truths grounded in divine nature, not independence from it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Calling resemblance 'derivative' requires prior independent account of goodness; theists deny such accounts are available without theological foundation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Goodness in humans (courage, compassion) is intelligible without reference to divine properties, suggesting resemblance plays no explanatory role.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If resemblance to God were necessary for goodness, all goodness would require theological commitment, yet moral agreement spans atheists and theists.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Derivative markers (like thermometer readings) track but don't explain phenomena, fitting how resemblance to God relates to actual moral properties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.