Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore rule-circularity and premise-circularity are eq... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Rule-circularity is not vicious, unlike premise-circularity

    Therefore rule-circularity and premise-circularity are equally vicious when evaluated by internalist standards of justification, as Fumerton's acquaintance theory and Bonjour's coherentism both entail.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    BonJour, Laurence(in epistemology)
    A contemporary American philosopher who studies how we know things; he defends coherentism, the view that beliefs are justified by how well they fit together.
    Coherentism(Epistemology; theory of epistemic justification)
    A doxastic theory of justification holding that only beliefs can serve as evidence, and that justification derives from the internal coherence of a belief system
    Fumerton, Richard(in epistemology)
    A contemporary American philosopher who studies how we know things; he developed an 'acquaintance theory' that says we're directly aware of certain facts and relationships.
    Internalist standards of justification(in epistemology)
    The idea that what makes a belief justified or trustworthy depends only on things inside your own mind—like your reasons, thoughts, and how they connect to each other.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Vicious (in logic)(in logic and argumentation)
    Problematic or invalid in a way that seriously undermines an argument; a reasoning mistake so bad it ruins your whole case.
    acquaintance theory(Used broadly to cover both Russellian and contemporary variants)
    Any view in the philosophy of mind or epistemology in which acquaintance — understood as a direct, nonjudgmental form of awareness — plays a central role
    premise-circularity(Distinguished from rule-circularity; always viciously circular)
    A property of an argument in which the conclusion is among its premises
    rule-circularity(Not necessarily viciously circular, unlike premise-circularity)
    A property of an argument in which the conclusion asserts something about an inferential rule that is used in that very same argument

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Rule-circularity is not vicious, unlike premise-circularity

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective