Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore, some paternalistic restrictions enhance rather... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Restrictions on liberty that can only be justified by moralism or paternalism are impermissible.

    Therefore, some paternalistic restrictions enhance rather than violate the very liberty Mill's harm principle aims to protect.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.True liberty requires capacity for autonomous choice; restrictions preventing cognitive impairment (e.g., drug addiction) preserve rather than eliminate this capacity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Mill's harm principle protects negative liberty from interference, but positive liberty—freedom to achieve one's goals—may require constraints on self-destructive choices.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.People's actual preferences often differ from their considered values; paternalism respecting deeper autonomy may honor liberty better than literal choice-permissiveness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Defining which restrictions 'enhance' liberty is inherently contestable; granting authorities this discretion risks systematic abuse under the guise of protection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Mill's harm principle specifically rejects paternalism as a valid ground for restriction; reinterpreting it to permit paternalism abandons rather than preserves his framework.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.People are generally better judges of their own interests than external authorities; paternalistic decisions systematically underestimate individuals' capacity for self-correction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consequentialism1 linkedRights & Liberty1 linked

    Related

    Defining which restrictions 'enhance' liberty is inherently contestable; grantin...Mill's harm principle protects negative liberty from interference, but positive ...Mill's harm principle specifically rejects paternalism as a valid ground for res...People are generally better judges of their own interests than external authorit...
    +3 moreShow less
    People's actual preferences often differ from their considered values; paternali...Restrictions on liberty that can only be justified by moralism or paternalism ar...True liberty requires capacity for autonomous choice; restrictions preventing co...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit