Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, the causal premise requires a non-temporal sense of priority that has never been adequately specified or defended.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Non-temporal priority is either metaphorically temporal (merely disguised) or unintelligible—a false middle ground between two options.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Physical causation, the primary explanatory domain, is intrinsically temporal; prioritizing abstract cases distorts the concept's core use.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Grounding relations and metaphysical dependence offer adequate non-temporal frameworks without requiring priority—making priority unnecessary.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Temporal priority (A before B) cannot ground causation since causation must explain why B follows A, not merely describe sequence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Causal explanations in mathematics and logic succeed without temporal order, suggesting non-temporal priority is conceptually coherent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Attempts to define non-temporal priority (via dependence, determination, grounding) remain circular or collapse into temporal notions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.