Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore, the claimed duty undermines itself when applie... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→There is a duty of right to act towards others so that external, usable objects can become someone's property.

    Therefore, the claimed duty undermines itself when applied to all rational agents simultaneously.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Universal duties create logical contradictions when their universal application makes compliance impossible for all agents.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A duty that requires some agents to fail or suffer when universalized is self-undermining by its own rational standard.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Kant's categorical imperative test requires duties to remain consistent across all rational agents without exception.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Many duties remain coherent when universalized: truth-telling, promise-keeping, and respect for autonomy cause no logical collapse.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A duty being demanding or requiring sacrifice doesn't constitute logical self-undermining—it may simply be difficult.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Some duties apply conditionally (e.g., 'if you borrow, repay'), so universal application doesn't create the alleged contradiction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Social Contract1 linkedRights & Liberty1 linked

    Related

    A duty being demanding or requiring sacrifice doesn't constitute logical self-un...A duty that requires some agents to fail or suffer when universalized is self-un...Kant's categorical imperative test requires duties to remain consistent across a...Many duties remain coherent when universalized: truth-telling, promise-keeping, ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Some duties apply conditionally (e.g., 'if you borrow, repay'), so universal app...There is a duty of right to act towards others so that external, usable objects ...Universal duties create logical contradictions when their universal application ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit