Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, the coexistence of omnipotence and creaturely freedom entails the possibility of evil without impugning any divine attribute.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
An omnipotent God could create free beings who always freely choose good, making divine permission of evil unnecessary.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If God foreknows all future free choices, creatures lack libertarian freedom, so the compatibility claim becomes unclear.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Allowing preventable suffering when able to stop it appears incompatible with perfect benevolence, regardless of freedom justifications.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Genuine freedom requires the real possibility of choosing otherwise, which entails the possibility of morally wrong choices.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An omnipotent God can create free beings without being responsible for their freely chosen evil acts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Evil as privation (absence of good) doesn't require God's positive causal action, preserving divine perfection.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.