Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Therefore, the cosmological argument depends on the ontol... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The cosmological argument is defective.

    Therefore, the cosmological argument depends on the ontological argument to determine the absolutely necessary being.

    Natural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Natural Theology

    Related

    That the most real being necessarily exists is the burden of the ontological arg...The cosmological argument is defective.The cosmological argument proceeds from an empirical premise about my existence ...The only concept that suffices to determine the properties of an absolutely nece...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Natural Theology
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    +2 moreShow less
    The ontological argument is defective because nothing can be determined to exist...The properties of this absolutely necessary being can be determined not through ...

    Similar

    The cosmological argument does not rely on notions central to the onto...92%So understood, the cosmological argument does not rely on logical nece...91%No being can be absolutely necessary in the sense required by the cosm...90%It is necessary to flesh out the nature of the necessary being if the ...88%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: cosmological-argument
    View source passageHide passage
    Kant argued that the cosmological argument introduced an empirical premise to evade the difficulties of the ontological argument. Although in the ontological argument the perfect being is allegedly determined to exist through its own concept, in fact nothing can be determined to exist in this manner; one has to begin with existence (see entry on Ontological Arguments). The cosmological argument, on the other hand, proceeds from an empirical premise about my existence to the existence of an unconditioned, absolutely necessary being, a being whose nonexistence is “impossible”, “absolutely inco...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective