Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, the epistemic barrier Alexander posits blocks acquaintance-knowledge but not propositional knowledge of deity's character.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Propositional knowledge of character seems to require some grounding in acquaintance, else we lack warrant for the propositions themselves.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If an epistemic barrier blocks acquaintance completely, skeptical worries arise about whether propositional claims about character are even justified.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The distinction assumes acquaintance and propositional knowledge are independent; but character-knowledge may require their integration to be meaningful.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Acquaintance-knowledge requires direct phenomenal experience; epistemic barriers can block experience while leaving propositional content accessible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
One can know true propositions about X's character via testimony or inference without ever being acquainted with X directly.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If deity is transcendent, direct acquaintance may be metaphysically impossible while propositional knowledge through revelation remains epistemically feasible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.