Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore, the expected utility of a decision may differ ... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Using an act's expected utility to assess a decision to perform the act leads to faulty evaluations of decisions.

    Therefore, the expected utility of a decision may differ from the expected utility of the act the decision selects.

    Consequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consequentialism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Causation2 linked

    Related

    A decision and the act it selects are distinct entities and may have different c...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A decision may fail to generate the act it selects.
    Using an act's expected utility to assess a decision to perform the act leads to...

    Similar

    Evaluating a decision by an act's expected utility leads to faulty eva...90%A decision's expected utility depends on the probability of its execut...89%Using an act's expected utility to assess a decision to perform the ac...85%It is better to evaluate a decision by comparing its expected utility ...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: decision-causal
    View source passageHide passage
    Causal decision theory’s account of self-ratification may put aside Jeffrey’s method of evaluating a decision by evaluating the act it selects. Because the decision and the act differ, they may have different consequences. For example, a decision may fail to generate the act it selects. Hence, the decision’s expected utility may differ from the act’s expected utility. Driving through a flooded section of highway may have high expected utility because it minimizes travel time to one’s destination

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective