Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, the formal reality of an idea may exceed the finite mind's reality by virtue of its rootedness in the infinite attribute of Thought.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Formal reality of ideas within a finite mind is constrained by that mind's cognitive capacity; infinite attribute membership doesn't enlarge individual minds.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Claiming ideas exceed finite reality by virtue of infinite grounding commits a category error: grounding source ≠ instantiated content's magnitude.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If all finite minds tap the same infinite Thought, their formal realities should be equal, yet demonstrably they differ dramatically in scope and accuracy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Ideas derive their formal reality from Thought itself, which as infinite attribute possesses greater reality than any finite particular.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A finite mind grasping an idea participates in something transcending its own ontological limitations through that infinite ground.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The content of thought can exceed the thinker's intrinsic being, as demonstrated by how minds comprehend truths vastly larger than themselves.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42