Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore, the intellect is passive in the sense of being... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The intellect is passive.

    Therefore, the intellect is passive in the sense of being potential with respect to the act of intellection.

    Consciousness & MindModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityConsciousness & Mind

    Related

    Something is passive in one sense if it receives forms, regardless of whether it...The intellect is passive.The intellect receives intelligible forms as the objects upon which it performs ...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The intellect is passive.94%Therefore, the intellect is passive only in the weaker sense, not in t...93%Therefore, the intellect is not passive in the fundamental (material) ...87%The traditional conception of the possible intellect as purely passive...86%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: simon-faversham
    View source passageHide passage
    According to Simon, the intellect is the faculty of the rational soul whereby it thinks. Simon, who follows the Aristotelian doctrine closely, holds this faculty to be immaterial, passive, and separate. It is separate because it does not need to use an organ in order to perform its operation of intellection. It is also passive, but not in the same sense matter is passive. In fact, there are two senses in which something is passive: it can receive forms with or without undergoing qualitative chan

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective