Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Therefore the jumble argument fails to satisfy the 'apparently acceptable premises' condition in Sainsbury's definition, since apparent acceptability requires more than doxastic commitment.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Apparent acceptability might just mean 'seems acceptable to rational agents,' making doxastic commitment precisely what determines apparent acceptability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The jumble argument's premises may appear acceptable to competent reasoners despite internal tensions, satisfying Sainsbury's condition adequately.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Distinguishing apparent acceptability from belief requires independent criteria; merely asserting this distinction doesn't establish that doxastic commitment is insufficient.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Apparent acceptability requires rational justification beyond mere belief; doxastic commitment alone doesn't constitute rational warrant.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The jumble argument relies on premises that contradict each other or lack coherent support, failing rational scrutiny independent of what we believe.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Sainsbury's framework distinguishes apparent acceptability from psychological acceptance to avoid collapsing epistemology into psychology.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.