Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Therefore, the model of wisdom 'holding volitions in check' presupposes an incoherent internal division within an absolutely simple being.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Simple beings can perform complex acts through unified operations; simplicity doesn't preclude sophisticated capacities.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.'Holding in check' may describe an external rational ordering rather than internal conflict within the agent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.An absolutely simple intellect could unify volition and restraint in a single, undivided act of rational will.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Absolute simplicity entails no internal distinctions, parts, or potentialities that could resist actualization.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Checking or restraining volitions requires an internal conflict between desire and restraint—a real composition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A being that cannot have internal divisions cannot perform actions requiring self-mastery or volitional restraint.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.