Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, the persistence question and the personal identity question track different ontological targets and cannot be equivalent.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Both questions fundamentally ask 'what makes X at time T1 identical to X at time T2?'—they share the same logical structure and truth conditions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Any successful criterion for personal persistence (spatiotemporal continuity, psychological continuity) simultaneously answers both questions without remainder.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If the two questions tracked truly different targets, we'd expect cases where persistence held but identity didn't—yet no such cases are coherently specified.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Persistence asks what makes an entity the same continuant over time; identity asks what makes a person the same subject of experience.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A human organism can persist biologically while personal identity criteria (psychological continuity, narrative unity) change or cease.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Different persistence conditions apply to different kinds of entities; personal identity is a normative and explanatory concept distinct from metaphysical persistence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.