Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, the 'propensity to diffuse' either describes a free inclination or implies a deficiency incompatible with divine perfection.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Free acts needn't arise from deficiency; a necessary being can freely overflow with goodness as expression of perfection, not compensation for lack.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The dichotomy is false: diffusion could be a perfection itself—infinite goodness expressing itself—rather than deficiency or constrained freedom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Theological tradition permits God's free creative acts without implying imperfection; voluntarism shows these aren't mutually exclusive categories.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Divine perfection requires absolute self-sufficiency; any inclination to diffuse suggests an unfulfilled need or lack within the divine nature.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If diffusion is free, it implies the divine could refrain from creation; yet an omnibenevolent being necessarily acts on benevolence, constraining freedom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Classical theology holds God lacks nothing; diffusion presupposes a motivating deficiency contradicting divine self-sufficiency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.