Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore the replacement argument cannot be conclusively... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The moral skeptic's replacement argument is not conclusively established

    Therefore the replacement argument cannot be conclusively established without a prior and contested resolution of the metaethical debate about whether motivation is internally or externally related to moral judgment.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Externally related(how Al-Farabi's argument assumes unity and multiplicity relate)
    Connected or related to each other from the outside, as separate things—like two objects touching but remaining independent.
    Motivation(what makes people choose to do things)
    The desires, goals, or reasons that drive someone to act in a particular way.
    conclusively established(in logic and argumentation)
    Proven beyond any doubt or reasonable disagreement; settled as definitely true.
    internally related(to describe the connection between reasons and actions)
    Two things are so deeply connected that you can't fully understand one without understanding the other—they're bound together by meaning, not just by coincidence.
    metaethical debate

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (Contrasted with substantive normative debates to argue against parity of reasoning)
    A second-order dispute about the nature and resolvability of moral disagreements, as distinct from the moral disagreements themselves
    moral judgment(The author stipulates reserving 'judgment' for the psychological sense to minimize confusion)
    Ambiguous between (a) a psychological state or kind of thought and (b) a linguistic utterance
    replacement argument(in ethics and philosophy of action)
    A philosophical argument that claims one thing (like an emotion or desire) can be substituted for or take the place of another thing (like a moral judgment) in explaining why we act.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    The moral skeptic's replacement argument is not conclusively established

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective