Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore the rivalry framing misrepresents what God is. — Carmelics
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Conceiving of God and science as competing explanations fails to grasp the relationship between God and the natural world.

    Therefore the rivalry framing misrepresents what God is.

    Against an aspect of GodNatural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Natural TheologyAgainst an aspect of God

    Connections

    1 topic

    Divine Attributes2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Natural Theology
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Conceiving of God and science as competing explanations fails to grasp the relat...If God exists, God is the creator of the natural world and is not a cause within...Treating God and science as rivals implicitly conceives of God as one more cause...

    Similar

    Oderberg is mistaken when he tries to establish the uniqueness of the ...69%The Principle of the Best is a consequence of the Principle of Suffici...68%Treating God and science as rivals implicitly conceives of God as one ...68%If the above is true, ECT is inconsistent with God's love66%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: moral-arguments-god
    View source passageHide passage
    Some philosophers believe that the randomness of Darwinian natural selection rules out the possibility of any kind of divine guidance being exercised through such a process. Some thinkers, including both some atheists and some proponents of what is called “creation science,” believe that evolution and God are rivals, mutually exclusive hypotheses about the origins of the natural world. What can be explained scientifically needs no religious explanation. However, this is far from obviously true;

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective