It is not the case that Therefore, the S5-valid inference from □¬K(p ∧ ¬Kp) to ¬◇K(p ∧ ¬Kp) presupposes classical modal duality that paraconsistent semantics explicitly rejects.
?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.