Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, the soul's self-moving capacity terminates at bodily death, not persisting eternally.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Self-movement (as in Platonic/Aristotelian thought) is a defining property of soul; eliminating it contradicts the concept itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Consciousness and intentionality may be substrate-independent; immaterial properties need not depend on physical decay.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The absence of empirical evidence for afterlife doesn't prove it's impossible—many unobservable realities escape direct verification.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Empirically, all observed self-movement in living things correlates with physical substrates; no self-motion occurs without matter.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The soul's capacities (sensation, appetite, locomotion) all depend on bodily organs; loss of organs entails loss of these capacities.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The principle of parsimony favors rejecting unobservable entities; positing eternal souls multiplies entities beyond necessity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.