Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, the timeless-to-temporal transition entails a mutable God, contradicting the classical theism the view aims to preserve.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Relational properties (like 'being simultaneous with event X') can change without intrinsic change.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Timeless-to-temporal transition may describe one direction of eternal divine presence, not God's becoming.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Classical theists can accept God's freedom to relate to time differently while remaining intrinsically immutable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Any transition from one state to another involves change in properties or temporal relations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Classical theism requires God's immutability as essential to divine perfection and aseity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A timeless being entering time necessarily undergoes relational change incompatible with immutability.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.