Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Therefore, timeless existence is incompatible with the relational and providential attributes essential to the God of classical theism.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Timelessness permits God to sustain all temporal relations without undergoing change, as a mathematical truth relates to infinitely many instances.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Divine knowledge of free acts needn't involve temporal causation; God can timelessly know what creatures freely do without determining outcomes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Providence requires omniscience and sovereignty, not temporal sequence; timeless God can providentially order all events without temporal succession.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Relational attributes require temporal succession: responding to prayer at time T requires God to exist differently before and after T.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Providence requires God to act intentionally within history; timeless existence precludes the temporal causation necessary for divine action.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Classical timelessness entails God knows all truths eternally without change, making genuine response to contingent events logically impossible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.