Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Therefore, we must have some relationship with every tota... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Contractualist blame can apply to total strangers, not only those within close personal relationships

    Therefore, we must have some relationship with every total stranger whom it makes sense to blame

    Moral ResponsibilitySocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilitySocial Contract

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A stranger who steals my bag is someone I can intuitively blameContractualist blame can apply to total strangers, not only those within close p...Contractualist blame requires a relationship as its groundScanlon affirms that we do have such a relationship with every total stranger

    Similar

    Scanlon affirms that we do have such a relationship with every total s...86%Contractualist blame can apply to total strangers, not only those with...84%Even if there is some relationship between a victim and the stranger w...78%It still seems possible to blame those with whom we have no standing r...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: contractualism
    View source passageHide passage
    Contractualist blame thus only makes sense within a relationship, such as friendship or family relationships. Impairment must be judged against the standard of what is appropriate within that relationship. This raises an obvious problem. What relationship could possibly ground judgements of blameworthiness and reactions of blame in the general moral case? Suppose a stranger steals my bag as I walk down the street. Intuitively, I can blame her. But what is my relationship to her? “Do we have a re

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective