Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    These broader welfare benefits linked to health improveme... — Carmelics
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→If the goal is maximizing welfare rather than health, disability may become irrelevant as a distributive criterion.

    These broader welfare benefits linked to health improvements may overwhelm the negative welfare impact of disability.

    BioethicsConsequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsConsequentialism

    Related

    If the goal is maximizing welfare rather than health, disability may become irre...Maximizing welfare requires accounting for all consequential welfare advances li...Therefore, disability need not be the decisive factor in welfare-maximizing heal...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Disability reduces welfare, and the more severe the disability, the gr...83%Because of the disability-welfare relationship, utilitarianism can pre...81%Domains other than health also impact welfare, undermining any health-...81%Therefore, disability need not be the decisive factor in welfare-maxim...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: disability-care-rationing
    View source passageHide passage
    One of the most robust defenses of how the CEA approach deals with disability comes in the form of Michael Stein’s general defense of utilitarianism against forms of resource egalitarianism (Stein 2006). Stein argues that only utilitarianism, by relying on the greater benefit criterion of distributive justice, can handle our intuitions about disability when it comes to health care allocation. He acknowledges that disability is conceptually related to ill-health or functional decrement (impairmen

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective