Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    These three conditions exhaust the possible forms of deci... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Justice is always to come in the future and is never present

    These three conditions exhaust the possible forms of decision, leaving no moment in which a decision can be called presently and fully just

    Justice & PunishmentSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentSkepticism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Moral Responsibility3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If a decision followed a rule calculably, it failed to respect the singularity o...If a decision has followed a rule with no foundation, it is again unjustIf a decision has not followed a rule, it is unjustJustice is always to come in the future and is never present

    Similar

    The moment of decision is a finite moment of urgency that cannot furni...77%Justice does not wait; a just decision is always required immediately73%In both possible cases, condition (iii+) fails to be satisfied.73%No decision can be assured as just because the ordeal of undecidabilit...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: derrida
    View source passageHide passage
    Derrida calls the first aporia, “the epoche of the rule” (Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, pp. 22–23). Our most common axiom in ethical or political thought is that to be just or unjust and to exercise justice, one must be free and responsible for one’s actions and decisions. Here Derrida in effect is asking: what is freedom. On the one hand, freedom consists in following a rule; but in the case of justice, we would say that a judgment that simply followed the law was only right, n

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective