Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    These two readings differ in argument structure (John as ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The representations 'Easy-to-please(John)' and 'Eager-to-please(John)' efface the semantic asymmetry between sentences (20) and (21).

    These two readings differ in argument structure (John as object of pleasing vs. John as subject of pleasing).

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Related

    If (20) is true, John is easily pleased, meaning it is easy for someone to pleas...If (21) is true, John is eager that he please someone or other.Representations like 'Easy-to-please(John)' and 'Eager-to-please(John)' treat bo...The representations 'Easy-to-please(John)' and 'Eager-to-please(John)' efface th...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    The mode of presentation associated with 'Hesperus' differs from that ...77%Evans' argument and Church's argument collapse into one another under ...77%Function-argument structure is distinct from subject-predicate structu...77%Pleonastic subjects are comparable to 'There' in 'There is something i...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logical-form
    View source passageHide passage
    If (20) is true, John is easily pleased. In which case, it is easy (for someone) to please John; and here, ‘it’ is pleonastic. But if (21) is true, John is eager that he please someone or other. This asymmetry is effaced by representations like ‘Easy-to-please(John)’ and ‘Eager-to-please(John)’. The contrast is made manifest, however, with (20S) and (21S); where ‘e’ indicates an unpronounced argument position.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective