Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    This denial targets the Scholastic property-of-motion vie... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Descartes' reciprocity of transfer thesis is more likely intended to counter the Scholastic view that motion is caused by a special property intrinsic to the moving body, rather than to defend relational motion.

    This denial targets the Scholastic property-of-motion view, not the question of relational versus absolute motion.

    CausationPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageCausation

    Related

    Descartes' reciprocity of transfer thesis is more likely intended to counter the...If there is nothing in a moving body that differs from its neighborhood of conti...Some Scholastics, such as Buridan, held that motion is caused by a special bodil...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The reciprocity of transfer thesis denies any such distinguishing property betwe...

    Similar

    The Leibnizian-Machian relational conception of motion holds that all ...77%The denial therefore functions as a confirmation of the analyst's inte...76%If motion is ontologically subordinate to extension, then motion and b...76%The concept of motion cannot be meaningfully characterized as either a...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: descartes-physics
    View source passageHide passage
    The problem with this line of reasoning, however, is that it only works if one presupposes that the two bodies are approaching one another, and this is not a feature of the system that can be captured by sole reference to the contiguous neighborhood of each individual body. Even if there is reciprocity of transfer between a body and its neighborhood, it is still not possible to determine which collision rule the impact will fall under, or if the bodies will even collide at all, unless some refer

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective