Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    This difference in attention does not correspond to any d... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Pure spotlight theories of attention, which allocate attention solely on the basis of location, are inadequate to account for all forms of attention.

    This difference in attention does not correspond to any difference in spatial location attended.

    Consciousness & MindPerception
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionConsciousness & Mind

    Related

    A purely location-based theory of attention allocation cannot account for attent...Pure spotlight theories of attention, which allocate attention solely on the bas...There is a phenomenological difference between attending to the pitch of a note ...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    A purely location-based theory of attention allocation cannot account ...83%Some shifts of attention are not shifts in the location attended.83%A purely location-based theory of attention allocation cannot account ...81%Pure spotlight theories of attention, which allocate attention solely ...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: attention
    View source passageHide passage
    Although the psychological debates about salience maps are ongoing, an argument against pure spotlight views can also be made on more traditional, phenomenological grounds. A pure spotlight theory, according to which attention is always allocated on the basis of location, seems unable to account for the sort of case that Hermann von Helmholtz and William James were concerned with (see section 1.5). There is, as their example suggests, a difference between attending to the pitch of a note and a

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective