Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    This empirical convergence among qualified judges constit... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Du Bos's position that critics have no better rules for arguing about art than cooks do for arguing about ragouts is mistaken

    This empirical convergence among qualified judges constitutes a practical standard of taste absent from culinary preference, which shows no comparable cross-cultural expert consensus.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Empirical
    # Empirical Empirical means based on real observation, experience, or experiments rather than theory or guessing. When something is empirical, it's proven by actually testing it or seeing it happen in the real world, not just thinking about it logically. For example, empirical evidence might be data collected from a survey or results from a scientific experiment that shows what actually occurs.
    convergence(alternative to consensus-based public reason)
    A model of public justification that allows appeals to religious reasons, thereby not requiring exclusively secular justifications
    cross-cultural expert consensus(what is absent from food preferences but present in taste judgment)
    When experts from different cultures and backgrounds all agree on something based on their professional knowledge.
    culinary preference(being contrasted with aesthetic or artistic judgment)
    Personal likes and dislikes about food and cooking.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    qualified judges(the people whose agreement is being discussed)
    Experts or people with specialized knowledge and training in a particular field who are considered trustworthy evaluators.
    standard of taste(Hume's aesthetics; SOT, 268)
    A normative framework that provides rules for confirming some aesthetic sentiments and condemning others, without committing to the absolute truth or falsity of sentiments

    Connections

    1 topic

    Aesthetics1 linked

    Related

    Du Bos's position that critics have no better rules for arguing about art than c...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective