Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    This inverts the standard claim: belief is neither suffic... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→To act for the reason that p, an agent must believe that p.

    This inverts the standard claim: belief is neither sufficient nor the correct criterion—knowledge is the relevant epistemic relation.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Knowledge requires justified true belief plus additional conditions; mere belief lacks these safeguards against error and manipulation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Epistemic norms should track what reliably tracks reality; knowledge does this better than belief, which can be true by accident.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Practical and moral contexts demand we distinguish knowledge from mere belief—acting on belief alone risks serious harm.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Knowledge is notoriously difficult to define; privileging it over belief may substitute one philosophical puzzle for another.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Much of human reasoning and action depends on beliefs we don't claim to know; dismissing these ignores their epistemic legitimacy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The belief-knowledge distinction may be pragmatic rather than metaphysically fundamental, making 'knowledge' an unstable criterion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Epistemic norms should track what reliably tracks reality; knowledge does this b...Knowledge is notoriously difficult to define; privileging it over belief may sub...Knowledge requires justified true belief plus additional conditions; mere belief...Much of human reasoning and action depends on beliefs we don't claim to know; di...
    +3 moreShow less
    Practical and moral contexts demand we distinguish knowledge from mere belief—ac...The belief-knowledge distinction may be pragmatic rather than metaphysically fun...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    To act for the reason that p, an agent must believe that p.