Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    This principle of equal counting entails that a billion l... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Sum-utilitarianism implies the repugnant conclusion: a sufficiently large but unhappy population is preferable to a small and happy one.

    This principle of equal counting entails that a billion lives at barely-positive utility mathematically dominate a million lives at high utility when the aggregate difference is positive.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Barely-positive utility(as used in ethics)
    Happiness or well-being that is just slightly above zero—so people are alive and not suffering much, but they're not very happy either.
    Equal counting principle(as used in ethics)
    The idea that each person's happiness matters the same amount, regardless of who they are. In other words, one person's well-being is counted equally with anyone else's.
    Mathematically dominate(as used in decision-making and ethics)
    To be clearly better according to the numbers. If one option produces a bigger total number than another, it 'dominates' that option mathematically.
    aggregate(Avicenna's argument for a necessary existent)
    The totality of all currently existing contingent individual things, each of whose existence is accounted for by its causal antecedents.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    utility(Mill's qualification distinguishing his conception of utility from narrower hedonistic or preference-based interpretations.)
    Utility in the largest sense, grounded on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being — not mere immediate pleasure or preference satisfaction.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism1 linked

    Related

    Sum-utilitarianism implies the repugnant conclusion: a sufficiently large but un...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective