Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Those who bear special risks for the benefit of others ar... — Carmelics
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Health professionals and first responders should receive high priority for scarce epidemic vaccines on grounds of contribution and reciprocity.

    Those who bear special risks for the benefit of others are entitled to special consideration in access to preventive interventions.

    BioethicsRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsRights & Liberty

    Connections

    2 topics

    Justice & Punishment2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Moral Responsibility
    2 linked

    Related

    First responders put themselves at increased risk of acquiring infection by work...Health professionals and first responders should receive high priority for scarc...The principle of reciprocity supports compensating those who sacrifice for the c...

    Similar

    HP2 justifies intervention to prevent harm to others whether caused by...75%HP2 permits intervention whenever harm to others can be prevented, reg...75%Different treatment is reflected in different levels of risk of moral ...72%Every instance of preventing one person from harming another is an ins...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: publichealth-ethics
    View source passageHide passage
    As we have already noted, financial resources are always limited in public health. There is never enough money in the public health sector to pursue all the policies and practices that could advance population health. Although arguably a redistribution of resources among competing public sectors, for example from a country’s defense budget to its health budget, may be ethically warranted and could relieve some of the more pressing constraints, tough priority setting and allocation decisions are

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective