Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Thought cannot be separated from the empirical and histor... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The Cartesian move from 'I think' to 'I am' is no longer available to modern thought.

    Thought cannot be separated from the empirical and historical unthought that constitutes who we are.

    Consciousness & MindTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consciousness & MindTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Personal Identity2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consciousness & Mind
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Skepticism
    1 linked

    Related

    Conversely, if 'I' denotes only a conscious being, then that 'I' fails to encomp...The Cartesian move from 'I think' to 'I am' is no longer available to modern tho...The content of a person's reality—living, working, speaking—always exceeds what ...

    Similar

    Thought is no longer pure representation and cannot be separated from ...83%In the case of our experience of ourselves, we do not identify ourselv...74%We cannot disentangle what is given from our ways of thinking about it...74%To know what a human being is, one must identify what makes a human be...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: foucault
    View source passageHide passage
    It might seem that Husserl’s phenomenology has carried out the Kantian project of synthesizing man as object and as subject by radicalizing the Cartesian project; that is, by grounding our knowledge of empirical truths in the transcendental subject. The problem, however, is that, as Foucault sees it, the modern notion of man excludes Descartes’ idea of the cogito as a “sovereign transparency” of pure consciousness. Foucault’s key claim in the dense chapter 9, “Man and his doubles,” is that thoug

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective