Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Thought experiments draw exclusively on concepts and intuitions derived from prior empirical experience.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Mathematical thought experiments generate novel truths not derivable from any prior empirical experience alone.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
We routinely imagine logically possible scenarios (like inverted qualia) that contradict our actual empirical observations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A priori conceptual analysis reveals constraints independent of how the world actually is empirically structured.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
All concepts we manipulate in thought experiments originate from sensory encounters or their combinations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
We cannot coherently imagine scenarios violating the causal structures we've repeatedly observed empirically.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Even abstract thought experiments rely on intuitions shaped by embodied experience in physical environments.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.