Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Thought experiments involving the fission or fusion of hu... — Carmelics
    Home/Personal Identity
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Thought experiments involving the fission or fusion of humans should be ruled out.

    Personal Identity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The total impact of the sum of laws that group humans together as a natural kind precludes humans from splitting into two or fusing with someone else.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Fission or fusion of humans is therefore not theoretically possible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Personal Identity

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    2 linked

    Related

    Fission or fusion of humans is therefore not theoretically possible.The total impact of the sum of laws that group humans together as a natural kind...

    Similar

    Fission or fusion of humans is therefore not theoretically possible.82%Twinning is a real-life instance of the argument from fission.75%Personhood, as treated in such experiments, would extend beyond the na...71%Thought experiments on personal identity are unavoidably inadequately ...71%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: thought-experiment
    View source passageHide passage
    We also agree that the inferences drawn in thought experimenting are highly problematic if the hypothetical scenario “is inadequately described” (Wilkes 1988, p. 8). But Wilkes seems to think that the lack of description is unavoidable, which supposedly amounts to a reason against philosophical thought experiments on personal identity because persons are not natural kinds. This makes it impossible to fill in necessary information to make the thought experiment work given its unavoidable underdet
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit