Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Timaeus 39e7-9 describes the Demiurge contemplating Forms... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The second god is not simple, because the second god contains the Forms of all entities.

    Timaeus 39e7-9 describes the Demiurge contemplating Forms, not possessing them as internal constituents, leaving containment ambiguous.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Timaeus 39e uses theōreō (contemplates), not echō (possesses), suggesting external relation to Forms rather than internal constitution.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If Forms were Demiurge's internal constituents, they'd be mutable with him; but Forms are eternal and unchanging, supporting external contemplation model.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Ambiguity about containment in 39e7-9 is textually defensible given Plato's deliberate avoidance of explicit metaphysical language at this juncture.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Timaeus 28a-c establishes the Demiurge creates *according to* an eternal paradigm; this 'according to' language suggests Forms structure his intellect.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A truly external relation to Forms would render Demiurge dependent on external standards he cannot control, undermining his divine rational agency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Neoplatonic and Middle Platonic commentators consistently read the Demiurge as intellectually containing Forms, suggesting ancient interpreters rejected ambiguity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Trinity1 linkedDivine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    A truly external relation to Forms would render Demiurge dependent on external s...Ambiguity about containment in 39e7-9 is textually defensible given Plato's deli...If Forms were Demiurge's internal constituents, they'd be mutable with him; but ...Neoplatonic and Middle Platonic commentators consistently read the Demiurge as i...
    +3 moreShow less
    The second god is not simple, because the second god contains the Forms of all e...Timaeus 28a-c establishes the Demiurge creates *according to* an eternal paradig...Timaeus 39e uses theōreō (contemplates), not echō (possesses), suggesting extern...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit